If you have children who are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or unresolved about their sexual identity, then you may be wondering if schools are a good place for them to go. Sadly, the answer is no. The school curriculum is designed to brainwash children against their sexuality. Racist activists are also involved in the brainwashing of children.
- Lesbian, gay, bisexual or unsure of their sexual identity in school
- Racist activists brainwash children in schools
- Church schools offer better education
- Federal, state and local governments would fund pre-K for all children
- Benefits of pre-K
- Costs of pre-K programs
- Support for universal pre-K among lawmakers
Lesbian, gay, bisexual or unsure of their sexual identity in school
Lesbian, gay, bisexual and unsure of their sexual identity students face an uphill battle in school, and some of the biggest obstacles they face are outdated laws and curricula. Unfortunately, many teachers shy away from discussing these issues, citing their own fear of repercussions from parents and administrators.
It can be difficult for teens to talk about their own sexuality in school, and even if they do, it’s a good idea to listen to them. They’ll likely ask questions about the differences between gender and sexuality, and it is important to limit their judgments on these subjects. Often, they will be surprised by what they learn about other people.
A few universities offer accommodations to students who are unsure of their sexual orientation. For example, the Rhode Island School of Design will ask prospective students to complete a Cultural Community Survey, which will include questions about gender and sexual orientation. Likewise, the State University of New York system allows students to write in their sexual orientation if they feel comfortable doing so.
The Real Education for Healthy Youth Act seeks to make school environments safer for LGBT youth. The bill would also restrict federal funding from programs that don’t meet the needs of LGBT youth. Furthermore, it would require the federal government to integrate school records with federal databases and programs.
Parents should talk to their children about their sexual identity and how they feel about it. It’s also important to listen to them and make sure they understand their questions and concerns. This will help them make the right decision about their sexual orientation and help them feel comfortable in school.
LGBT students described multiple patterns of discrimination, bullying, and exclusion at school. Having to deal with such situations can impact their mental health. States should repeal laws that discriminate against LGBT students, and enact laws that protect LGBT students from bullying. They should also make sure schools have policies and resources to support LGBT students.
Racist activists brainwash children in schools
Racist activists have used public schools to indoctrinate children with their own ideology. One Philadelphia elementary school forced fifth-graders to simulate a Black Power rally to “free Angela Davis.” In Springfield, Missouri, educators forced white students to rank themselves according to their own “power and privilege.” In Buffalo Public Schools, a teacher told kindergarteners that white people perpetuate systemic racism. She even showed children a video of dead black children.
In recent years, conservative activists have seized on a broader debate about “critical race theory” (CRT), a decades-old academic framework that examines the role of race in institutions. Right-wing media personalities have purposefully invoked CRT as a term for systemic racism, and their campaign has effectively chilled discussions about race and diversity in schools.
A June investigation by NBC News revealed that 165 groups — many of them supported by conservative think tanks and media outlets – are trying to turn the COVID mandate into political wedge issues. The group’s efforts have already had some impact: nine states have enacted anti-CRT legislation, although the law passed in Arizona has been struck down.
These activists are also targeting SEL programs and school-based mental health initiatives. Many conservative groups have accused schools of brainwashing children and using such programs to promote anti-white racism. Some have even circulated opt-out forms for surveys that measure a child’s emotional well-being. These activists consider the surveys to be “data mining” and an invasion of privacy.
In addition to this, the Arizona Department of Education has created a “race equity” toolkit which claims that children display the first signs of racism by age three months and are highly biased by age five. A similar program has been created by Raytheon, the nation’s second largest defense contractor. This initiative encourages white employees to “confront their privilege and reject equality.” Bank of America is also pushing for the defunding of police and the police.
This campaign has sparked an outraged response from parents. While many critics praised the efforts of Poland and Hungary to block the influence of LGBT groups in schools, the campaign’s supporters believe that schools should be the last place where activists brainwash children. Further, Zemmour’s proposal has a more conservative approach by eliminating foreign languages from the elementary school curriculum and focusing on math and science.
The Education Secretary is now investigating whether activists are teaching race theory in schools. The revelations have come after allegations that school staff pushed children as young as 10 to write letters criticising the Prime Minister. Nevertheless, the Education Secretary has stated that it is part of democracy to enable children to form their own political views. In addition, new guidance is set to be issued to schools this week that will require teachers to present opposing viewpoints.
Church schools offer better education
The reason many parents choose church schools is simple: they provide a better education than public school. A Christian school provides children with a more challenging learning environment and is an environment where Christian values are valued. Parents also benefit from a sense of community that is cultivated through the parish school. Private schools can be expensive, but many Catholic schools provide generous tuition assistance programs.
While most church-operated schools are Roman Catholic, others belong to Protestant denominations. Today, there is a movement to revive the prestige of small church-connected colleges and universities. The need to restore their influence is considered urgent given the rise in the demand for technical training. While many parents prefer the educational quality of church-operated schools, many others prefer the more traditional liberal arts education.
One way to improve the education system is to provide universal pre-kindergarten. The proposal has bipartisan support, but it has faced some opposition from some lawmakers. In this article, we look at the costs and benefits of such a program, as well as the levels of support among lawmakers.
Federal, state and local governments would fund pre-K for all children
A proposal to fund universal pre-kindergarten and full-day kindergarten programs for four-year-olds would reduce class sizes by up to one-third and create nearly 1,500 new classrooms. The legislation would also spend nearly $100 million on educational technology, $35 million on professional development, and $50 million on textbooks and software. The law would also fund programs to prevent violence in school and extend the school day.
Benefits of pre-K
Pre-K provides many benefits for young children. It helps develop language and social skills. It mimics the environment of a school. Kids learn to play with other children and socialize with peers. Many preschools also have activities that help them learn to read. A child who attends preschool is prepared for kindergarten.
Research shows that children who attend a high-quality pre-kindergarten program will do better in school. This will lead to better academic performance and help children complete more years of school. But what about the emotional benefits? There is a need to improve public school funding for early childhood programs. However, this research doesn’t directly address whether pre-K is necessary for students.
Pre-K programs provide children with nutrition and health services. These programs also help decrease the cost of medical care for children who develop health problems. Children also get immunizations, which can prevent disease. Children who attend preschool are more likely to have healthier immune systems than their peers. This can benefit both parents and the child.
Another benefit of pre-K programs is that they often provide a variety of activities. Some preschools have drop-in programs, while others offer structured programs. Both kinds of programs can help your child develop new interests. It’s important to find the right preschool for your child, so make sure to tour different places before enrolling.
Pre-K is important for children’s development, as their brains are still developing. Starting early will improve a child’s ability to absorb information and learn how to behave. Starting early will help them develop their social skills and emotional well-being. And pre-K also helps to prevent behavior problems.
Costs of pre-K programs
Many states and cities provide state-funded pre-K programs for children. The cost of a full-day program varies by state, but most programs require income eligibility. Many programs also only provide a half-day program. However, the state can help make the program more affordable by providing additional funds per child. With the additional funding, the state can expand the program and give it the best chance of success.
Studies show that children who attend high-quality programs do better in school, which helps the economy. They also have fewer health problems and fewer chances of repeating a grade. In addition, they are less likely to engage in crime and are less likely to need costly special education. Ultimately, the benefits of quality preschool programs far outweigh the costs.
Costs of pre-K programs vary based on factors such as income distribution, child welfare spending, and teacher salaries. However, studies have shown that these costs are offset by increased tax revenues, due to the lower incidence of child maltreatment. In addition, the cost of public education decreases, since children are less likely to drop out of school or need expensive special education. Governments also see lower costs for their judicial system, because fewer kids are involved in juvenile crime.
Although the state of California has promised to cover half of the cost of pre-K programs, it still does not pay enough. In fact, the state needs to increase its funding to $5,000 for every child. This would cover a large majority of the cost. In many cases, the cost of private pre-k programs is half of what the cost is of a publicly funded universal pre-kindergarten program.
The costs of universal pre-kindergarten programs may be higher than what we have estimated. This analysis assumes a full-fledged program by 2017, but in reality, it will take longer to achieve this. There may also be start-up costs for scaling up the investment. However, the benefits of universal pre-kindergarten programs will far outweigh any costs associated with their implementation.
The costs of universal preschool programs are estimated to be $19.1 billion per year. However, this figure is likely to rise as population increases and inflation rises. By the time this program is fully phased in, it is expected to cost approximately $6600 per child.
Support for universal pre-K among lawmakers
A new bill introduced by Vice President Biden would fund universal pre-K through state governments. It would allocate $112 million to teacher training programs and another $197 million to “grow-your-own” programs. These programs recruit and train young people to become teachers. It would also increase federal funding.
Increasing access to universal pre-K is a key goal of the Build Back Better bill. If fully implemented, child care and early education programs would provide huge benefits for children, their parents, and society. This type of funding would also help states’ economies, as the program would improve the educational status of low-income children and their families. It is one of the best investments the country can make for its competitiveness, the future of children, and parental choice.
While many states and federal programs aim to provide high-quality early childhood education to low-income children, research shows that the quality of these programs can negatively affect their outcomes. The federal Head Start program and most state programs target children from low-income families. However, fewer than half of three and four-year-olds in low-income families enroll in pre-K programs. This lack of access to early childhood education disproportionately affects these children. Investing in universal pre-K could help fix these disparities and help more women return to the workforce.
However, while most Democrats support universal pre-K, details are sparse. At this early stage, many states haven’t decided whether they will join the program or not. This policy is being pushed by the First Five Years Fund, a nonprofit organization that promotes health and education programs for children. Its supporters also include former Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, who established the state’s first public pre-K.
But the success of universal pre-K depends on the willingness of states to participate. In the last year, states have shown uneven results when implementing federal programs. For example, some states barely disbursed emergency housing aid and federal unemployment assistance, while others failed to implement it at all. This would be a major test for the program’s design and implementation.
Biden’s plan aims to expand universal pre-K and provide more funding to states. The program reflects Biden’s push to promote social mobility and equity. The federal government already provides a program that shares these goals: Head Start. As a result, the program is a key component of the Biden plan.